Pro life arguments against abortion essay on
Yet even if one is not sure when personhood becomes a reality, one should err on the side of being conservative simply because so much is at stake. Once more by the universalizability criterion, we should extend moral considerability to cases of potentiality, with greater weight assigned to more probable potentialities. The Gray Area People often consider the following when deciding whether they hold an extreme position for or against the legality of abortion. As such, its health is dependent on her health, and cannot be regarded as a separate entity as it cannot exist outside her womb. They are much more likely argjments leave of school; receive inadequate prenatal care; rely on public assistance to raise a child; develop health problems; or end up divorced. WadeU. Many of those orphans now argumebts from sever mental and physical health problemsincluding reduced brain size, schizoaffective disorder, and sociopathy.
Previously, she served as Chief Counsel for the U. House of Representatives Constitution Subcommittee and was the pro-life spokesperson for the U.
On abortion arguments against pro life essay Posted
Conference of Catholic Bishops. She received a law degree pro life arguments against abortion essay on Georgetown University. He formerly served as a presidential appointee at the U. Previously, he was chief of staff to two Members of Congress. The authors would like to thank Eliza Thurston for her research assistance. Introduction Abortion is unlike any other issue debated today. Millions of American women have aborted a child, and the pain, continue reading, and emotional need to justify what was done, both on the part of the mother and on the part of her loved ones, is strong and deep.
What follows, therefore, are the best arguments from science, the law, and women's rights to advance the pro-life case against abortion. Arguing from Science The "classic" arguments from the other side are collapsing under the weight of science. Cite the Facts Here is a thumbnail sketch of the scientific evidence of the existence of human life before birth.
These are irrefutable read article, about which there is no dispute in the scientific community. Is it just a cell or is it an actual organism, a "being?
Also, the Hyde Amendment prevents most public funds from going toward abortions. Donovan, Blessed Are the Barren: They are not alone: Abortion is in direct defiance of the commonly accepted idea of the sanctity of human here No civilized society permits one human to intentionally harm or take the life of another human without punishment, and abortion is no different.
You should raise them, and then provide the answers. The zygote is composed of human DNA and other human molecules, so its nature is undeniably human and not some other species. It fulfills the four criteria needed to establish biological life: Scientists define an organism as a complex structure of interdependent elements constituted to carry on the activities of life by separately-functioning but mutually dependant organs. Once formed, it initiates a complex sequence of events to ready it for continued development and growth: The zygote acts immediately and decisively to initiate a program of development that will, if uninterrupted by accident, disease, or external intervention, proceed seamlessly through formation of the definitive body, birth, childhood, adolescence, maturity, and aging, ending with death.
This coordinated behavior is the very hallmark of an organism. Here is a good time to recite the scientific proofs, and maybe make a philosophical point of your own: We're either persons or property; and even the staunchest abortion defender will be reluctant to call pro life arguments against abortion essay on human child a piece of property. Another good time to recite the scientific proofs. A brief word about the politicization of the definition of "pregnancy. If the science on when life begins is clear, why do some organizations claim that "pregnancy" doesn't begin until a week later, at implantation?
Acceptance of an implantation-based definition of "pregnancy" would allow abortion providers to mischaracterize pills and technologies that work after conception but before implantation as "contraception," making them potentially less subject to regulation and certainly more accept-able and attractive to consumers.
Indeed, two institutes who support legalized abortion have pushed for this type of pregnancy re-definition for decades: If your interlocutor raises this issue, point out that: Giving a quick recitation of the child's development will weaken the "not a person yet" mentality. The cardiovascular system is the first major system to function. At about 22 days after conception the child's heart begins to circulate his own blood, unique to that of his mother's, and his heartbeat can be detected on ultrasound.
Electrical brain activity can be detected at six or seven weeks,  and by the end of the eighth week, the child, now known scientifically as a "fetus," has developed all of his organs and bodily structures. Today, parents can see the development of their children with their own eyes. The obstetric ultra-sound done typically at 20 weeks gestation provides not only pictures but a real-time video of the active life of the child in the womb: Fetal surgery has become a medical specialty, and includes the separate provision of anesthesia to the baby.
You can cite some of the surgeries now performed on children before their birth, such as shunting to bypass an obstructed urinary tract, removal of tumors at the base of the tailbone, and treatment of congenital heart disease. If the medicine and science don't persuade your audience, consider citing authorities from the "pro-choice"  community itself. Mention "Pro-choice" feminist Naomi Wolf, who in a ground-breaking article inargued that the abortion-rights community should acknowledge the "fetus, in pro life arguments against abortion essay on full humanity" and that abortion causes "a real death.
Those who justify abortion by claiming that "no one knows when life begins" are not arguing science but rather their own brand of politics, philosophy, or even religion. Their argument is not about when life begins but about when, or whether, that life deserves legal acknowledgment and protection. And that brings us to our next topic: Arguing from the Law Roe v. Wade Most people do not really know what the Supreme Court decided on January 22, They assume that the Court made abortion legal in the first trimester of pregnancy only, and that it is subject to substantial limits and regulations today.
You will be able to change minds when you inform them that neither of these assumptions is true. The Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade did not create a limited right to abortion but a virtually click right to abortion throughout pregnancy. The case involved read more Texas law prohibiting abortion except "for the purpose of saving the life of the mother.
Seven members of the Supreme Court agreed. While admitting that abortion is not in the text of the Constitution, they nevertheless ruled that a right to abortion was part of an implied "right to privacy" that the Court had fashioned in previous rulings regarding contraception regulations. They also ruled that the word "person" in the Constitution did not include a fetus.
The Court ruled that abortion must be permitted for any reason a woman chooses until the child becomes viable; after viability, an abortion must still be permitted if an abortion doctor deems the abortion necessary to protect a woman's "health,"  defined by the Court in another ruling issued the same day as "all factors--physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman's age--relevant to the well-being of the patient.
Stated another way, the Supreme Court gave abortion doctors the power to override any abortion restriction merely by claiming that there are "emotional" reasons for the abortion. Abortion advocates want to hide this, of course, but liberal journalists such as David Savage of the Los Angeles Times have reported the truth about Roe, saying the Supreme Court created an "absolute right to abortion" under which "any abortion can be justified. Chances are your audience will not know that the Court created an unlimited right to abortion, and odds are good that they won't agree with it.
They are not alone: In the mids, "pro-life" was a distinct minority view. But in Mayfor the first time, a significantly greater percentage of Americans self-identified as "pro-life" than "pro-choice. The late John Hart Ely of Yale, for instance, argued that Roe was wrong "because it is not constitutional law and gives "pro life arguments against abortion essay on" no sense of an obligation to try to be.
Wade opinion, calls it "one of the most intellectually suspect constitutional decisions of the modern era. Cite Abortion Incidence You should also have at the ready this shocking fact about abortion incidence in America: The United States has the highest abortion rate in the western world, and the third-highest abortion rate of all developed nations worldwide. Cite this statistic and its source when-ever you speak about abortion law in America. Discuss Elective Abortion Another important statistic that you must al-ways cite is also from the Guttmacher Institute. Learn more here the last 25 years Guttmacher has conducted two major studies asking women why they chose abortion and their answers have remained basically the same: Rather, it is quite compelling simply to say that the vast majority of abortions are "purely elective" abortions, done on healthy women with healthy babies.
Some "Pro-Choice" Arguments "Outlawing abortion will mean back-alley butchers and countless women dying. Overturning Roe doesn't make abortion illegal, it simply changes the venue of the question: You may want to concede the point that, even after limitations are established in the states, there will always be abortionists willing to break the law and exploit vulnerable article source for financial gain.
But because a destructive activity will not be completely eradicated is no reason to make or keep it legal think of drug laws or laws against prostitution.
- Discuss Elective Abortion Another important statistic that you must al-ways cite is also from the Guttmacher Institute.
- Cite Abortion Incidence You should also have at the ready this shocking fact about abortion incidence in America:
- Furthermore, it is not uncommon for women to experience deep regrets after aborting their offspring.
No compassionate person wants a woman to suffer through the personal tragedy of abortion, whether legal or illegal. As Feminists for Life says, women deserve better than abortion. Establishing legal limits to the current "absolute right to abortion" will mean fewer abortions, and that is to the good of women, children, families, and society.
There are a number of points to make regarding the charge that countless women will die. First, it is impossible to calculate the number of maternal deaths from abortion before Roe v. Wade because they were not reported, so any claim regarding the number of maternal deaths from illegal abortions this web page purely speculative. However, it is a fact that abortion industry insider Bernard Nathanson admitted to circulating false numbers. In Nathanson said: How many deaths were we talking about when abortion was illegal?
In NARAL we generally emphasized the drama of the individual case, not the mass statistics, but when we spoke of the latter it was always "5, deaths a year. But in the 'morality' of our revolution it was a useful figure, widely accepted, so why go out of our way to correct it with honest statistics? The overriding concern was to get the laws eliminated, and anything within reason that had to be done was permissible. Mary Calderone, a former medical director for Planned Parenthood, estimated that 9 out of just click for source illegal abortions were done by licensed doctors: Abortion, whether therapeutic or illegal, is in the main no longer dangerous, because it is being done well by physicians.
In fact, hundreds of women have died from abortion since Roe v. Wade according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,  and this is likely only a fraction of the actual number in light of the fact that several states including, significantly, California have failed to report abortion data for many years  and in light of the latitude given to doctors in reporting causes of death e.
Despite its tight abortion restrictions, Ireland has the lowest maternal mortality rate in the world, according to a study by several agencies at the United Nations. The Supreme Court created a virtually unlimited right to abortion, a policy with which most Americans disagree. In fact, our country is not divided down the middle on abortion, but most of America is substantially with us. As we continue to expose the truth about abortion law and practice, we will move closer to the day that abortion policy making is returned to the people. Arguing from Women's Rights The modern "pro-choice" movement is desperate to protect the image of abortion as positive and pro-woman.
Ironically, their biggest threat is from those they claim to champion: Abortion-rights proponents are devastated by the women of the Silent No More Awareness Campaign, for example, who stand with their "I regret my abortion" click the following article  and by the powerful of Feminists for Life make the compelling argument that "women deserve better than abortion.
Paper gathers arguments abortion life essay pro against on chart accounts
It is important to be accurate in your representation of these women; commit to memory this phrase: They speak avainst about how abortion was not an act of empowerment but the result of abandonment, betrayal, and desperation, and how it has negatively affected their lives. There are nearly pro life arguments against abortion essay on. They tell stories of how they were coerced into aborting their children by boyfriends, husbands, friends, and family.
They describe how abortion was far from being a choice.