Sample of a book review paper
Book Reviews What this handout is about This handout will help you write a book review, a report or essay that offers a critical perspective on a text. It offers a process and suggests some strategies for writing book reviews. What is a review? A review is a critical evaluation of sample of a book review paper text, event, object, or phenomenon. Reviews can consider books, articles, entire genres or fields of literature, architecture, art, fashion, restaurants, policies, exhibitions, performances, and many other forms.
This handout will focus on book reviews. For a similar assignment, see our handout on literature reviews. Above all, a review makes an argument. The most important element of a review is that it is a commentary, not merely a summary. You can offer agreement or disagreement and identify where you find the work exemplary or deficient in its knowledge, judgments, or organization. You should clearly state your opinion of the work in question, and that statement will probably resemble other types of academic writing, with a thesis statement, supporting body paragraphs, and a conclusion.
See our handout on argument. Typically, reviews are brief. In newspapers and academic journals, they rarely exceed words, although you may encounter lengthier assignments and extended commentaries. In either case, reviews need to be succinct. While they vary in tone, subject, and style, source share some common features: First, a review gives the reader a concise summary of the content.
This includes a relevant description of the topic as well as its overall perspective, argument, or purpose. Second, and more smaple, a review offers a critical assessment of the content. This involves your reactions to the work under review: Finally, in addition to analyzing the work, a review often suggests whether or not the audience would appreciate it. Becoming an expert reviewer: Someone has asked for your opinion about something that you revies feel unqualified to evaluate.
The point is that someone—a professor, a this web page editor, peers in a study group—wants to know what you think about a particular work.
Vintage of sample review book a paper for your
You may not be or feel like an expert, but you need to pretend to be one source your particular audience. Tactfully voicing agreement and disagreement, praise and criticism, is a valuable, challenging skill, and like many forms of writing, reviews require you to provide concrete evidence for your assertions.
Consider the following brief book review written for a history course on medieval Europe by a student who is fascinated with beer: Historically, ale and beer not milk, wine, or water were important elements of the English diet. The student describes the subject of the book and provides an accurate summary of its samole.
Sample of a book review paper the reader does not learn some key information expected from a review: As a critical assessment, a book review should focus on opinions, not facts and details. Go here should be kept to a minimum, and specific details should serve to illustrate arguments.
Now consider a review of the same book written by a slightly more opinionated student: I wanted to know about the rituals surrounding drinking in medieval England: Bennett provided none of that information. I liked how the book showed ale and beer brewing as an economic activity, but the reader gets lost in the details of prices and wages. I was more interested in the private lives of the women brewsters. The reader has a sense of what the student expected of the book, but no sense of what the author herself set out to prove.
Although the student gives several reasons for the negative review, those examples do not clearly relate to each other as part of an overall sample of a book review paper other words, in support of a specific thesis. This review is indeed an assessment, but not a critical one. Here is one final review of the same book: It combines balanced opinion and concrete example, a critical assessment based on an explicitly stated rationale, and a recommendation to a potential audience. Moreover, the student refers to an argument about feminist history in general that places the book in a specific genre and that reaches out to a general audience.
The example of analyzing wages illustrates an argument, the analysis engages significant intellectual debates, and the reasons for the overall positive review are plainly visible. The review offers criteria, opinions, and support with which the reader can agree or disagree.
Internet, these of review paper a sample book ACCOUNTS Featured
Thus, writing a review is a two-step process: What follows is a series of questions to focus your thinking as you dig into the work at hand. While the questions specifically consider book reviews, you can easily transpose them to sample of a book review paper analysis of performances, exhibitions, and other review subjects. What is the thesis—or main argument—of the "sample of a book review paper" If the author wanted you to get one idea from the book, what would it be?
How does it compare or contrast to the world you sample of a book review paper What has the book accomplished? What exactly is the subject or topic of the book? Sample of a book review paper the author cover the subject adequately? Does the author cover all aspects of the subject in a balanced fashion? What is the approach to the subject topical, analytical, chronological, descriptive?
How does the author support her argument? What evidence does she use to prove her point? Do you find that evidence convincing? Why or why not? How does the author structure her argument? What are the parts that make up the whole? Does the argument make sense?
We could use it for population concentration, highways, land elevation, and so many other things! You will not be able to cover every character or idea. The bird thought, "If I never forever endeavor" then I won't ever learn. Truth must be found somewhere beyond the earthly domain, in those regions where the gods live. You could also link the title to the boik to show how the title explains the subject matter. While editing errors and organizational incongruities plague some of the latter chapters, many of the shortcomings of this first edition will likely be alleviated by later editions. Antoine de Saint-Exupery flew a la Ligne mail route between France and Spain that sometimes crossed hostile territory. How is the book arranged:
Does it persuade you? How has this book helped you understand the subject? Would you recommend the book to your reader? Who is the author? Nationality, political persuasion, training, intellectual interests, personal history, and historical context may provide crucial details about how a work takes shape. What difference would it make if the author participated in the events she writes about?
Out of what field does it emerge? Does it conform to or depart from the conventions of its genre? These questions can provide a historical or literary standard on which to base your evaluations. If you are reviewing the first book ever written on the subject, it will be important for your readers to know. Writing the review Once you have made your observations and assessments of the work under review, carefully survey your notes and attempt to unify your impressions into a statement that will describe the purpose or thesis of your review.
Check out our handout on thesis statements. Then, outline the arguments that support your thesis. Your arguments should develop the thesis in a logical manner. The relative emphasis depends on the nature of the review: What follows is just one of many ways article source organize a review.
Introduction Since most reviews are brief, many writers begin with a catchy quip or anecdote that succinctly delivers their argument. But you can introduce your review differently depending on the argument and audience.
Occur of review book paper sample a you
In general, you should include: The name of the author and the book title and the main theme. You could also link the title to the subject to show how the title explains the subject matter. Perhaps you want to situate a book about the Cuban revolution in the context of Cold War rivalries between the United States and the Soviet Union. Another reviewer might want to consider the book in the framework of Latin American social movements.
Your choice of context informs your argument. The thesis of the book. If you are reviewing fiction, this may be difficult since novels, plays, and short stories rarely have explicit arguments. Your thesis about the book. Summary of content This should be brief, as analysis takes priority.
The necessary amount of summary also depends on your audience. If, on the other hand, your audience has already read the book—such as a class assignment on the same work—you may have more liberty to explore more subtle points and to emphasize your own argument. See our handout on summary for more tips. Analysis and evaluation of the book Your analysis and evaluation should be organized into paragraphs that deal with single aspects of your argument.
This arrangement can be challenging when your purpose is to consider the book as a whole, but it can help you differentiate elements of your criticism and pair assertions with evidence more clearly. You do not necessarily need click here work chronologically through the book as you discuss it.
- Readers can gain knowledge of what it was like to work in New York City in the early s.
- Does the book jacket provide any interesting details or spark your interest in some way?
- Is the author refuting earlier works, building on another author's ideas or rehashing an earlier piece of work?
Given the argument you want to make, you can organize your paragraphs more usefully by themes, methods, or other elements of the book. If you find it useful to include comparisons to other books, keep them brief so that the book under review remains in the spotlight.